David Gulbransen

Wise Up, Suckers

  • All About Dave!
    • The Basics
    • Simpsonized!
    • My Tattoo
    • My Motorcycle (R.I.P)
  • Professional Info
  • Friends
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Preaching to the Perverted (Blog)
You are here: Home / Archives for 2006

Archives for 2006

Microsoft: We can’t even *give* Vista away!

December 28, 2006 by Dave!

Okay, that’s not quite true. But apparently, after the flack they received for trying to buy reviews and snow the blogosphere give prominent bloggers a chance to preview Vista on swanked-out, fugly, yet free laptops, it turns out, Microsoft wants the laptops back.

Classic. Let’s hope Microsoft executed Vista better than they’ve executed this PR campaign. Or maybe this is what happens when you try to buy a viral marketing campaign… and do it poorly.

Filed Under: Blogging, Technology

Microsoft’s Free Laptops…

December 27, 2006 by Dave!

Apparently, Microsoft is handing out free laptops to prominent bloggers, hoping they will write up their (positive?) experiences with Vista. Of course, I wouldn’t turn down a free laptop, Vista or not. But I seriously have to question their choice of machines… I mean, a Ferrari branded laptop? C’mon, Microsoft, that comes off like you’re… well, trying to compensate for something. *ahem*

Filed Under: Blogging, Technology

Movie Meme

December 27, 2006 by Dave!

1. Name a movie that you have seen more than 10 times.
Star Wars. Any of them. 🙂
2. Name a movie that you’ve seen multiple times in the theater.
See #1. Seriously, I was a “Star Wars” generation kid… I dressed up as Boba Fete for one Halloween!
3. Name an actor that would make you more inclined to see a movie.
Johnny Depp. I really enjoy his approach to his art and his craft.
4. Name an actor that would make you less likely to see a movie.
Faye Dunnaway. I really, really do not care for her acting ability.
5. Name a movie that you can and do quote from.
Being of the male sex, I can quote from far too many movies. Among them, many Tarantino films, a fair selection of Adam Sandler, and almost anything by Hal Hartley. I think I have a few Hal Hartley shorts memorized completely.
6. Name a movie musical that you know all of the lyrics to all of the songs.
Hmm… Probably “The Sound of Music” from when I was a kid. Or “The Wizard of Oz”
7. Name a movie that have been known to sing along with.
RHPS (If you know the acronym, you know the movie.)
8. Name a movie that you would recommend everyone see.
Wow. That’s too broad… one movie? Everyone? Okay, “Wings of Desire”.
9. Name a movie that you own.
You name a movie I don’t! Seriously, I own a whole lot of movies.
10. Name an actor that launched his/her entertainment career in another medium but who has surprised you with his/her acting chops.
Dwight Yoakam. Seriously. He can actually act. Wil Smith would have to be in there… for all the fluff movies he does, check out “Six Degrees of Separation”. He’s incredible in it.
11. Have you ever seen a movie in a drive-in? If so, what?
Well, I hate to be a one-trick pony, but “Star Wars”!
12. Ever made out in a movie?
Yes.
13. Name a movie that you keep meaning to see but just haven’t yet gotten around to it.
An Inconvenient Truth
14. Ever walked out of a movie?
Yes. And oh, the irony… it was a movie I was *in*… and one by a personal hero (John Sayles)!
It was “Eight Men Out” and I was an extra. I went to see it to see myself on the big screen and was so bored I left before I even got to my scenes. 🙂 I think Sayles is a certified genius filmmaker… but I don’t share his passion for baseball.
15. Name a movie that made you cry in the theater.
I honestly can’t remember… I probably cried at E.T. in the theatre, but most of the movies that have made me cry (that I can recall) were rentals. (I really cried at the end of “Life is Beautiful”)
16. Popcorn?
Very rarely. And usually only if my wife wants some. I’m a “Milk Duds” guy… but Diet Coke, all the time.
17. How often do go to the movies (as opposed to renting them or watching them at home)?
Before law school? Or since law school? 🙂
18. What’s the last movie you saw in the theater?
The Borat movie…
19. What’s your favorite/preferred genre of movie?
Indie… definitely.
20. What’s the first movie you remember seeing in the theater?
I think Bambi… but I really don’t remember it much. Then again, I don’t remember last Monday!

Filed Under: Film, Meme, Personal

Holiday Music Madness!

December 19, 2006 by Dave!

Since I’m finished with finals (yeah!) and I’ve been tagged by in limine… I give you: Dave’s Top 5 Holiday Songs!

5. AKIM & The Teddy Vann Production Company – Santa Claus Is A Black Man
I found out about this masterpiece on an episode of Fresh Air which featured John Waters and his new anthology CD, A John Waters Christmas. This song is everything you would expect from a John Waters Christmas and more…

4. Sloppy Seconds – Hooray For Santa Claus
This one is a cover of the theme song from “Santa Claus Conquers the Martians” which you just have to love. Plus I grew up on punk rock in Indiana, which means you pretty much have to love Sloppy Seconds.

3. The Kinks – Father Christmas
The Kinks were punk rock before punk rock was punk rock. I think they’re under-rated overall, and this song is a definite Christmas classic in my book.

2. The Pogues – Fairytale of New York
Another classic, from another under-rated band. Although MXPX does a pretty good cover, you can’t go wrong with the original. Considering I pretty much hate almost all Irish music, I can’t help but love The Pogues.
And…. *drum roll*…

1. Jose Feliciano – Feliz Navidad!
If you don’t like this song, you are a Grinch. Sorry, it’s true.

There you have it… my list which is probably skewed towards the non-conventional, but hey, that’s how I swang, yo. Merry Christmas!!!

Filed Under: Meme, Music, Personal

As much as I like law school…

December 14, 2006 by Dave!

..when I am waist deep in final exams, and Sony releases something like this–it does make me long for the days when I was in production.

Back to Patent Law.

Filed Under: Film, Law School, Technology

The Dave Paradox

December 13, 2006 by Dave!

Last night I was listening to my iPod, which decided to play Anti-Flag, N.B.C. (No Blood-thirsty Corporations). As I was sitting waiting for my Corporations final to begin. Ironically, I love both that song and the class.

Filed Under: Personal, Politics

Suing Edgar Bronfman

December 5, 2006 by Dave!

It’s probably because I’m studying for Business Organizations and have derivative suits on the brain, but when I saw this little tidbit where Edgar Bronfman, CEO of the Warner Music Group, admits that his kids have broken the law and downloaded music. Of course, unlike those parents suffering lawsuits at the hands of the RIAA, Bronfman preferred to “keep [their punishment] within the family”.

Now, I don’t know what kind of (legal) entity the RIAA is (and don’t have time to look it up), but it sure would be killer if some of the “artists” or labels they are supposedly representing were to hold their feet to the fire and make them file suit against Bronfman. Why shouldn’t he and his children suffer the same fate of bogus lawsuits that other parents face?

Filed Under: Law School, Music, Politics, Technology

Banning Laptops in the Classroom

November 30, 2006 by Dave!

Since law professors who blog seem to bring up banning laptops at least twice a quarter, I thought I should bore you with a law student post about law professors who want to ban laptops in the classroom. I’m just coming off of a long business organizations class about dividends, so let me assure you, this post will probably be just as rambling and incoherent as most of my posts.

I do understand that the vast majority of professors want students to be involved in discussion and to be attentive and engaged in their class.

Professors, on the other hand should understand that most students want to be involved in discussion and to be attentive and engaged in their class. When that doesn’t happen, I think it’s a personal dynamic, not a technology issue.
I think it’s important for faculty to step back for a moment, to the pre-laptop days, and ask themselves these simple questions:

  • Were all of your students diligent note takers, not scrambling to copy your lecture verbatim?
  • Did they never pass notes, whisper in the back row, daydream out the window, or doodle in their notebooks?

If you can honestly answer yes to all of those questions, then by all means. Ban laptops. You win. But I doubt anyone can _honestly_ answer yes to those questions.

I do support professor’s rights to manage their courses as they see fit. But I think they shouldn’t be discriminatory against the class of students who have piss-poor handwriting. Yes, we’re a class, and I think it’s time we were protected. If you’re going to ban laptops, ban all note-taking. Let’s face it, note taking itself is pretty distracting. Provide your lecture notes to the class as a handout after each class and forbid note-taking altogether. Then everyone in the class is on equal footing.

Okay, maybe that’s extreme, but it illustrates my point: banning laptops has a negative impact on all students who use the technology properly just to try to reach a very small number of students who wouldn’t be paying attention anyway.

Now, I’m sure there are some unique reasons for faculty to ban laptops in the class, but it seems like every article/post/rant I’ve read from a professor who was banning them fell into one of three broad generalizations:

*Laptops create a “physical barrier” to discussion.*

Several professors have claimed that the “picket fence” of laptop screens creates a physical barrier that inhibits discussion. But being in a horse-room shaped lecture hall with 150 seats isn’t a physical impediment to discussion at all. Nope. I love to have lively discussions with the back of my classmate’s heads. Very conducive to intellectual discourse.

Maybe, maybe, this would be true in a small seminar, with only a dozen students or so. Although, I think that’s more of a generational gap. I think faculty see the laptops as a physical barrier, but that most students don’t see them. Students today are comfortable with technology–it’s been a part of their education for most, if not all, of their lives. There might be a few students who think they are intrusive as well, but I’d also wager that there are a few shy students who are glad to have the shelter–and may even participate more because they have that shield. Either way, I think the actual impact is much more minimal than it’s often made out to be. In the end, I think it’s a wash.

*Laptops encourage people to take verbaitim notes instead of writing down just what is important.*
First, why is it _necessarily_ bad to take down notes verbatim? I’ve encountered a few students who do this, and yes, I think some of them are missing the forest for the trees. But I know of one classmate in particular who was a very good and diligent student who took “verbatim notes”. She did it because it was part of her learning process. It’s just how she learned. She internalized what was being said as she was transcribing, and it helped her later during the distilling process of outlining.

Second, are there really that many people in your classes with their fingers flying on the keyboard trying to take down every word? I’ve only ever seen a few people doing this, even in large 1L required classes. This is just a guess, I don’t have the data to back this up (although, I haven’t encountered a professor who did either), but I suspect if you took away their laptops, those same people would be scribbling away, filling their notebooks with your every word. Only now, they won’t be able to read half of it. So what would banning the laptop accomplish?

Well, for starters, it would penalize those, like me, with poor penmanship. But more important, it doesn’t accomplish the goal you’re trying to achieve, which would only “benefit” a handful, and instead penalizes the vast majority of people who take notes effectively with a laptop.

*Laptops create a tempting diversion from paying attention or participating in class.*

They do. I’ll acknowledge that the diversion offered by a networked laptop are multitudinous. Between instant messaging, the web, games… it’s a non-stop cornucopia of distraction. So what?

Laptops have increased the distractions, but they are hardly the first distraction in the classroom. In the days before laptops, I have it on good authority that students would sit in the back row and on occasion, whisper. I also have discovered in some boxes in my mother’s attic, some form of primitive instant messaging that she called “notes”. Apparently, these “notes” were constructed of paper and then deviously passed from one student to another–all during the course of a lecture!

Sarcasm aside, I’m sympathetic to the frustration of competing with a laptop for students attention. But the reality is that it is a part of the job. Your job as a faculty member is to organize and present the material in a comprehensible and engaging manner. I’ve had some outstanding professors over the years, and those who were passionate about their subject matter, well prepared for class, and dynamic speakers *never* had to “compete” for the attention of their students. Period. There will *always* be one or two (or six, in a class of 150) people who are “checked out”. But you kind of just have to ignore them.

Making the other 144 people in the class suffer while you try to reach those six is doing a disservice to everyone, yourself included. Here’s my advice: write them off. Maybe they will fail your class: but it will be their own fault. It’s the best gift you can give them–they don’t want to be their anyway.

But, if I may make a gentle suggestion… if you find yourself consistently competing for your students attention in class, you should revisit your organization of the material (if not the material itself) and you should get some brutally honest criticisms of your speaking skills. Some academics are outstanding in the classroom. Some are outstanding in print. Some are gifted in both, but that rare. There’s nothing wrong with that–but recognize your own limitations and work on improving them instead of focusing your misplaced frustration on technology that actually helps a great many students.

*Laptops are being used by the government to emit thought controlling radio waves to track my movement.*

Okay, no professor (to my knowledge) has ever proffered that argument. But if they did, they’d be the coolest faculty member ever. Or insane. Or both.

So where does that leave professors who want to ban laptops in the classroom? Recently, a professor posted his laptop policy, which essentially allowed students to use them for notes, but if they were found using them for other purposes, they would lose the right to use them.

At first, it sounds like a good compromise, but it’s still really discriminatory against laptop users, and it still is only treating the symptom, not the disease. Would students taking notes on paper “lose the privilege” if they were caught passing a note? Or doodling in the margins? Or actually writing fiction instead of taking notes? (I knew a student who did that in one class… I noticed he was writing a whole lot during one not very interesting lecture. I asked what he was working on, and he said, “A short story.” Since all lawyers secretly want to be writers, it seemed like an okay idea to me.)

I do use the net during class. In fact, it saves me time and my back. When we’re looking at a statute in class, instead of flipping through the 1200 page supplement, I pull it up on Westlaw/Lexis. Nifty! But that would (technically) violate such a policy. And it wouldn’t be possible with an all out ban. And what reasonable argument can be made that it’s better to lug around a 10lb. book to get the same information?

The problem professors are really struggling with here is not the laptop. The laptop is the symptom, not the disease. In fact, the laptop is the symptom of a few diseases, not all of them afflicting students. There’s student apathy, boring material, poor speaking skills, the list goes on.

So I would ask that any professor considering banning laptops try these steps first:

    1. Make a note of how many people are *really* “checked-out” in your class. What percentage of the class is it? Is it really that high? Or is it just the percentage of people who are going to be checked out anyway?
    2. If the percentage *is* high, re-examine your class. Review your course materials–is the material interesting? Can it be made more interesting by doing something out of the ordinary (role playing, incorporating current events, interesting hypos?)
    3. Finally, take a good, honest look at your lecture skills. Videotape yourself and see if you would be interested while you were lecturing. Or ask past students who did well in your class what you could do to improve. I’ve had one or two classes where I checked out, simply because the professor was a very poor lecturer. And in both cases, I actually enjoyed speaking with the professor one-on-one, they were very different in that type of interaction. I have no doubt that if they made a real, concerted effort to improve their skills, their classes would have improved dramatically.

If you’ve tried all of that, and you still are having problems in the class, try the laptop ban. But be fair about it:

    1. Make your policy known in the registration bulletin/course descriptions so people know your policy *before* they have to register.
    2. Consider using a “compromise” ban–that is, laptops only for notes but a violation of that policy results in a total ban for that student.
    3. If you do decide to ban 100%, and your course is a required course, make sure there is at least one other section taught by someone else for those who depend on the ability to actually read the concise, type-written notes they do take.

And of course, if you’re banning laptops to escape the mind control radio emissions of the National Security Agency, try a tinfoil hat first.

Filed Under: Law School, School, Technology

Another Movie Meme

November 30, 2006 by Dave!

Popcorn or Candy? Candy. Milk duds or Receses Pieces.
Movie you’ve been meaning to see forever? Well, between working full-time and law school in the evening, that list would be *way* too long for this post…
You are given the power to recall one Oscar: who loses it, and to whom? Easy. 2001 Animated Feature Film–the first year of the category. Shrek won, a travesty. I would pry it from his green ogre hands and properly award it to Richard Linklater and the crew at Flat Black Films for Waking Life. They was robbed!
Steal one costume from a movie for your wardrobe. Boba Fett. C’mon, the dudes a badass.
Your favorite film franchise is: Star Wars. Duh.
Invite five movie people over for dinner. Who are they? Why’d you invite them? What do you feed them? Hmmm… Five? Okay… do they have to be alive? I’m going to assume they do, which is a shame, because dinner with Billy Wilder would be *awesome*. Here goes:
John Sayles. He’s a genius and responsible for one of the greatest American movies: Matewan.
Steven Soderbergh. Another great American indie filmmaker and very largely responsible for a renaissance in American indie film with Sex, Lies, and Videotape.
Richard Linklater. Another great American indie. Yeah, I know, I saw The Newton Boys but you have to give him Slacker, Before Sunrise, Tape and one of my favs, Waking Life.
Johnny Depp. I just love this guy. I’ve never seen someone who was originally written off (21 Jump Street anyone?) become such a great artist. I’ve also never seen an interview with him that wasn’t interesting and engaging. I’m sure he has off nights, but I think he’d make a great guest.
Mark Cuban. He went to my alma matter. His production company, 2929, which with Soderbergh has done some really innovative things with distribution. He owns HDNet. And I have a business plan for a production company I would like to pitch him that could be funded with just a small fraction of his Maverick’s payroll. 🙂
I would feed them Chicken with 40 Cloves of Garlic. It’s easy and delicious.
What is the appropriate punishment for people who answer cell phones in the movie theater?
Stocks. As in the kind that bind your hands and feet for public humiliation. In the lobby of the theater.
What’s the scariest thing you’ve ever seen in a movie? Excluding documentaries, I’d say, Kazaam… Shaquille O’Neal is a great example of how being a sports star has nothing to do with your ability to act.
Your favorite genre (excluding “comedy” and “drama”) is… indie.
You are given the power to greenlight movies at a major studio for one year. How do you wield this power?
I would use my power to greenlight a ton of small(er) budget indie films to try to usher in a new golden age of quality studio films. You know, like back in the day when studios were making films like Midnight Cowboy and Network, two amazing films that would probably never get the green light at a major studio today.
Bonnie or Clyde? See, that’s too tough. I mean, on the one hand, Warren Beatty is fine and all, but Faye Dunnaway makes me want to hurl. (Except in Network, about the only decent performance she’s ever given, but I digress.) So I’m gonna cheat and go with another classic couple/criminal film, Breathless and say Jean-Paul Belmondo–cooler than Warren Beatty any day.

Filed Under: Film, Personal

Saint Felix

November 14, 2006 by Dave!

This weekend was an extraordinarily good cheese weekend. I wandered into my local cheese shop, Marion Street Cheese Market and asked my cheese monger, “What have you got that you really like?”

Well, he was quite excited to be carrying cheeses by a cheesemaker from Wisconsin, Felix Thalhammer. Apparently, Marion St. is the first shop outside Wisconsin to carry Felix’s aged cheeses. Now that I’ve sampled them, I can see why Eric was so excited!

Felix owns Capri Creamery specializing in artisan goat cheeses. The first cheese I tried and purchased is Saint Felix.

St. Felix is an aged, washed rind goat cheese, which take 2-3 years to prepare. The St. Felix is apparently the first of these cheeses, and let me assure you, it’s fantastic.

The cheese has a good, strong smell, you just know it’s going to be good! It has a nice, firm texture, with a larger crumble, so it has a nice bite to it, but it still feels great in your mouth, maybe even a little “fatter” than most goat’s milk cheese feel. It’s a washed rind cheese, so it’s nice and salty, with a slightly gritty, nutty finish that will remind you slightly of Parmesan.

Since Felix’s cheeses are made by hand by him alone, they’re probably going to be hard to find outside of the Midwest, or even Wisconsin for that matter! But I did notice you can order on his website. You should do yourself a favor and order some. If the St. Felix is any indication of Felix’s talent for cheese, we should have some really stunning cheeses down the road!

Coming soon, Govarti…

Filed Under: Cheese, Food
Next Page »
www.flickr.com
My Photo Stream...

Recent Blog Posts

  • The Most Important Person in Your Family
  • Ribs
  • Blawg Review
  • Blawg Review #321:
  • SodaStream. Now I’m carbonating everything!

Categories

Return to top of page

Copyright © 2026 David Gulbransen · All Rights Reserved